AI evaluation and governance

Know what the AI can prove before giving it more power.

We convert trust into testable claims: what the system must do, what it must never do, what evidence it leaves, and who approves consequential action.

BUILT FOR

Teams with deployed or proposed AI systems that need a readiness verdict, permission model, evaluation evidence, or controlled route into consequential work.

01 / THE PRESSURE

What is getting in the way.

  • No acceptance criteria
  • Unknown failure modes
  • Permissions broader than the job
  • No replay or audit trail
  • Model changes without regression testing
02 / WHAT WE CAN BUILD

What changes the operation.

  • Architecture review
  • Evaluation suite
  • Adversarial testing
  • Authority and escalation map
  • Provenance and replay
  • Monitoring and remediation roadmap
03 / THE OUTCOME

What the investment should create.

  • Defensible readiness decisions
  • Safer authority
  • Reproducible evidence
  • Clear remediation priorities

Start with the uncertainty that matters most.

These services can stand alone or become a sequence from assessment through implementation.

05

AI Assurance Review

Determine whether an AI system is accurate enough, controlled enough, and observable enough for the work it has been given.

See deliverables
07

Fractional AI Architect

Give leadership and staff a coherent operating model for AI—connected to real implementation rather than a generic presentation.

See deliverables
02

AI Operations Build

Replace repetitive handoffs across email, documents, spreadsheets, software, customers, and managers with controlled operating flows.

See deliverables

Start with the bottleneck. We will identify the machinery.

No technical brief required. Tell us what is slow, expensive, fragile, private, or strategically important.

Send the problem